May 25, 2011

Forfeiting Accountability: Georgia Lawsuit Targets Hidden Civil Forfeiture Funds

By Scott Bullock

IJ’s nationwide initiative against forfeiture abuse brought us to Georgia in March. There, we filed a lawsuit to shine a light on off-budget law enforcement slush funds that are created with property and cash taken by civil forfeiture.

Under draconian civil forfeiture laws in Georgia and most other states, the police can seize your home, car, cash or other property upon the mere suspicion that it has been used or involved in criminal activity, regardless of whether you have been convicted of a crime or even arrested. Civil forfeiture represents one of the greatest assaults on private property rights in our nation. And Georgia has some of the worst forfeiture laws and practices in the nation, earning a
D- in our national forfeiture report released last year. One good aspect of Georgia forfeiture law, however, is that it at least attempts to ensure that civil forfeiture is subject to public scrutiny. Georgia law requires local law enforcement agencies to annually itemize and report all property obtained through forfeiture, and how it is used, to local governing authorities.

But many, perhaps most, local Georgia law enforcement agencies fail to issue these forfeiture reports, thus turning forfeiture proceeds into slush funds shielded from public view. That is a breach of the public trust and a betrayal of taxpayers. Our lawsuit on behalf of five Georgia citizens seeks to force the head law enforcement officers of Fulton County and the City of Atlanta to disclose all of the property they have seized under Georgia forfeiture statutes along with how they utilized that property.

IJ’s Georgia lawsuit grew directly out of our strategic research program. While assembling our Policing for Profit report last year, we discovered that civil forfeiture laws are notoriously opaque. Only 29 states require reporting of property seized through forfeiture, and, even in those states that require reporting, such as Georgia, the laws are not properly enforced.

For instance, we took a random sample of 20 law enforcement agencies in Georgia and found that only two were reporting as required. This research led to the publication of a new report: Forfeiting Accountability: Georgia’s Hidden Civil Forfeiture Funds. The report also highlights examples of abuse with forfeiture funds, including a Georgia sheriff spending $90,000 in forfeiture money to purchase a Dodge Viper, and the Fulton County district attorney’s office using forfeiture funds to purchase football tickets.

The mission of our case is simple but vitally important: Law enforcement should follow the law. Our latest forfeiture lawsuit will guarantee that Georgia law enforcement agencies are accountable to taxpayers and property owners throughout the state.

Scott Bullock is a senior attorney at the Institute for Justice.

Share

Related Case

Shining the Light on Law Enforcement Slush Funds: Lawsuit Seeks to Force Georgia Police to Follow the Law and Report Property Seized Through Civil Forfeiture

Also in this Issue

Liberty & Law

IJ Puts Eminent Domain on the Ropes in National City

May 25, 2011

IJ client Ali Bokhari, above, explains, 'If this law stays on the books, my customers will be forced to spend twice as much money for exactly the same service, and I risk losing my business.'

Liberty & Law

Limousine Lockout

May 25, 2011

El Paso tried to shut down street vendors like IJ client Maria Robledo by making it virtually impossible to sell food on city streets.

Liberty & Law

Victory for El Paso Street Vendors

May 25, 2011

Liberty & Law

Defending the First Amendment at the Supreme Court

May 25, 2011

Liberty & Law

Research Shows Clean Elections’ Harms

May 25, 2011

IJ client Jestina Clayton has been told by the Utah cosmetology board that she can no longer braid hair. Excessive government-imposed licensing on a safe and uncomplicated practice, such as hairbraiding, is both outrageous and unconstitutional.

Liberty & Law

Returning to Our Roots

May 25, 2011

IJ's trial successfully defending the property rights of our clients required not only strong minds and strong spirits, but also strong back as out team moved IJ's litigation 'war room' to a different hotel, thereby saving the Institute $14,000.

Liberty & Law

Behind the Scenes at the CYAC Trial

May 25, 2011

Liberty & Law

Buzzing By The Constitution

May 25, 2011

Liberty & Law

Your Investment in IJ Remains True After 20 Years

May 25, 2011

Liberty & Law

School Choice Takes Off

May 25, 2011

Liberty & Law

Taking the Measures of Freedom to Legislatures

May 25, 2011

The Institute for Justice has led the way in changing the terms of the debate on campaign finance laws by publishing multiple studies that examine the burdens disclosure places on grassroots political activists, including: Disclosure Costs: Unintended Consequences of Campaign Finance Reform, Campaign Finance Red Tape: Strangling Free Speech & Political Debate, Locking Up Political Speech: How Electioneering Communications Laws Stifle Free Speech and Civic Engagement, Mowing Down the Grassroots: How Grassroots Lobbying Disclosure Suppresses Political Participation, and Keep Out! How Campaign Finance Laws Erect Barriers to Entry to Political Entrepreneurs.

Liberty & Law

Political Privacy Should be a Civil Right

May 25, 2011

Subscribe to get Liberty & Law magazine direct to your mailbox!

Sign up to receive IJ's bimonthly magazine, Liberty & Law, along with breaking news updates about the Institute for Justice's fight to protect the rights of all Americans.